jamba-large-1.6 vs zai-glm-4.6

Capability for the money

zai-glm-4.6 is 1.5× cheaper than jamba-large-1.6 and scores higher on every benchmark they share — there is no case for paying more here.

1. Coding

   writing and fixing code

   LiveCodeBench
   jamba-large-1.617.2%

   zai-glm-4.656.1%

   zai-glm-4.6 +38.9

2. Hard reasoning

   graduate-level science and multi-step analysis

   GPQA Diamond
   jamba-large-1.638.7%

   zai-glm-4.663.2%

   zai-glm-4.6 +24.5

Averaged over the benchmarks both models sat, zai-glm-4.6 returns 25.1 points of pass rate per dollar of blended price against 8.0 — the ratio that decides whether the dearer model earns its rate.

Each figure is a pass rate: the share of that test set the model answered correctly, measured by a third party rather than self-reported by the lab. Rows are different tests of different difficulty, so compare a model against the other model, not one row against the next. No published following instructions or tool use score for one of these models, so those lenses are omitted. And a benchmark is not your workload — it narrows the shortlist, it does not pick for you.