grok-4-1-fast-reasoning vs llama-3.3-70b-versatile

Capability for the money

grok-4-1-fast-reasoning is 2.3× cheaper than llama-3.3-70b-versatile and scores higher on every benchmark they share — there is no case for paying more here.

1. Following instructions

   extraction, classification, sticking to a format

   IFBench
   grok-4-1-fast-reasoning52.7%

   llama-3.3-70b-versatile47.1%

   grok-4-1-fast-reasoning +5.6

2. Coding

   writing and fixing code

   LiveCodeBench
   grok-4-1-fast-reasoning82.2%

   llama-3.3-70b-versatile28.8%

   grok-4-1-fast-reasoning +53.4

3. Tool use

   multi-step agent work against real tools

   τ²-bench
   grok-4-1-fast-reasoning93.3%

   llama-3.3-70b-versatile26.6%

   grok-4-1-fast-reasoning +66.7

4. Hard reasoning

   graduate-level science and multi-step analysis

   GPQA Diamond
   grok-4-1-fast-reasoning85.3%

   llama-3.3-70b-versatile49.8%

   grok-4-1-fast-reasoning +35.5

Averaged over the benchmarks both models sat, grok-4-1-fast-reasoning returns 285.0 points of pass rate per dollar of blended price against 59.5 — the ratio that decides whether the dearer model earns its rate.

Each figure is a pass rate: the share of that test set the model answered correctly, measured by a third party rather than self-reported by the lab. Rows are different tests of different difficulty, so compare a model against the other model, not one row against the next. And a benchmark is not your workload — it narrows the shortlist, it does not pick for you.