command-r-plus vs jamba-large-1.7

Capability for the money

jamba-large-1.7 is 1.3× cheaper than command-r-plus and scores higher on hard reasoning (GPQA Diamond) — there is no case for paying more here.

1. Coding

   writing and fixing code

   LiveCodeBench
   command-r-plus12.2%

   jamba-large-1.718.1%

   jamba-large-1.7 +5.9

2. Hard reasoning

   graduate-level science and multi-step analysis

   GPQA Diamond
   command-r-plus32.3%

   jamba-large-1.739.0%

   jamba-large-1.7 +6.7

Averaged over the benchmarks both models sat, jamba-large-1.7 returns 8.2 points of pass rate per dollar of blended price against 5.1 — the ratio that decides whether the dearer model earns its rate.

Each figure is a pass rate: the share of that test set the model answered correctly, measured by a third party rather than self-reported by the lab. Rows are different tests of different difficulty, so compare a model against the other model, not one row against the next. No published following instructions or tool use score for one of these models, so those lenses are omitted. And a benchmark is not your workload — it narrows the shortlist, it does not pick for you.